Fall is basically upon us. For life, fall kind of sucks. End of summer, not yet winter. For movies, fall is a marvelous time as the Oscar season's curtains open and we get to see some great films. Buzz bops around at film festivals, like Toronto. Oscar charts start to make sense. And somewhere during breaks from the brilliance, we get a Disaster Movie or something, to remind us that Aaron Seltzer is still, unfortunately, alive.
But I, naive I, have decided to take on a little Fall Film Preview just to post my thoughts on some upcoming flicks. We'll go through the fall, two weeks per post, until we reach winter, and slam on the brakes once we hit January. I have blogging mood swings, so I might just buck the whole idea if I feel like it. So, September, here we come...
September 12thBurn After ReadingBackground: It's the Coens on their little playground, cooking up a criminal farce about fumbling idiots. The crucial memoirs of a former CIA agent fall into the unsuspecting hands of dumb gym employees who use it to their advantage. Then Anton Chigurh (Tilda Swinton) comes in and shoots all of them with a cattle gun. The Coens, crawling up from their indie roots, have come a long way, getting their hands on one of the most A-listy casts of the year (Pitt, Clooney, McDormand, Malkovich and Swinton).
Buzz: The film has gotten mixed reviews prior to opening the Venice Film Festival. The majority of British press fell ass over elbows for it, though some thought it was "too stupid". I myself, find it almost cocky for the Coens to pull such a dumb farce after No Country For Old Men. From what I hear, it almost seems like a sloppy effort. That's
just me.
Interest Level: Pretty high. This almost seems Fargoesque and Fargo is probably in my top ten..ever. The trailer was brilliant and Swinton looks hilarious for some reason. Can we conclude that she's going to play a
cold bitch in every movie now?
Oscar Hopes: Pretty little. A month ago, before Venice, an acting nod and probably a writing nod seemed possible. Doesn't look like that's the point of this film. It's a screwball comedy. End of story. (Not all of the Coens films have been mega Oscar darlings, like No Country).
Bottom Line: Not
Coens Coens it seems, but still well worth seeing.
TowelheadBackground: It's Alan Ball at the helm, this time, of American Beauty and Six Feet Under fame. It's a story of growing up, as a Lebanese tween moves in with her uncle in suburban Texas. The script should be good with Ball running the show. The cast includes all-stars Toni Collette and Aaron Eckhart.
Buzz: There have been a few early screenings, and overall, the reviews have been positive. Supposedly, it's dark, funny, and despicable. The film has come under some fire for the racy, or maybe racist, title, but it firmly stands its ground in its naming.
Interest Level: It's an intriguing movie, with some good actors and a good writer. The trailer was pretty good, displaying that suburban angst as Ball is so good at doing.
Oscar Hopes: Eh, I don't think this really has much of a chance. The acting doesn't seem like it will land any nominations (Collette appears to have a small role), so its best chance is at writing, which doesn't seem entirely probable.
Bottom Line: May be a poor man's American Beauty, except this time, it's Lebanese Beauty. Doesn't have the same ring to it.
Righteous KillBackground: It's a gritty crime drama decked out with a stellar cast and a...wait, it doesn't have a good director attached. Wait. It's going to suck. It's artificial-seeming, from the looks of the trailer. It wants to be The Departed, but let's face it: Pacino's last role was as some idiot (who didn't own a damn comb), fumbling around in some crappy movie. De Niro's last role was a gay pirate. It's not the '70s anymore, is it? 50 (or is it fitty?) Cent lends his acting gifts.
Buzz: This is obviously getting a lot of buzz due to the long-time-coming pair of Pacino and De Niro, among the best actors of their generation. No early word on how good the film is, but the general consensus is that it isn't going to be Goodfellas.
Interest Level: Decent. It will be interesting to see the two actors together, but overall...DVD?
Oscar Hopes: Who the hell knows? Maybe it's their comeback? Maybe there need be no Oscar-winning director or writer? Maybe they turn in great, harrowing performances instead of treating it like a Sunday drive? I highly, highly doubt it, but you can always believe. I mean, maybe, if you had a pretty high blood alcohol level, this might look good on paper.
Bottom Line: It's just for fun.
The WomenBackground: It's the superchick-flick of the summer. Should do great at the box office. It's a story about..women..a lot of them..they're friends..they're catty..am I being sexist?..nah. It's epic, starring a handful of top actresses, like Annette Bening, Jada Pinkett Smith, Eva Mendes, Debra Messing, the list goes on.
Buzz: The film, one by Diane English, has been in the works for over a decade. Meg Ryan wanted to star/produce, Julia Roberts, coming off Pretty Woman fame, wanted to star and produce. Lots of Women wanted to have their hands on this. In the end? We get the not-as-famous spouse of Will Smith, a sitcom star who hasn't done much since Will and Grace, Meg Ryan, hot off of her plastic surgery disaster and Eva Mendes, who isn't that great. Huh.
Interest Level: Not my cup of tea, at all, really. I do think it will serve its purpose and be an above-average chick-flick, there seems to be some passion put into this project. But, no really my thing. I'm one of The Men.
Oscar Hopes: Not a whole lot of Oscar bait here. A romantic comedy is never an Oscar darling. No way. If anything, Annette Bening will get some good press.
Bottom Line: Seems like it might end up coming together well, as well as getting all the women out to see it.
September 19thLakeview TerraceBackground: I don't really know squat about this film, other than the fact that the promos on TV look pretty good. I don't really know what to think of Samuel L. Jackson. He's in brilliant roles, like Jules of Pulp Fiction, but then he turns around and stars in Jumper. This might be more on the 'Jumper' region of the spectrum. This film is about a household's neighbor, a whacked-out cop, who appears to cause a hell of a lot of problems for this family, because they're an interracial couple.
Buzz: The director, Neil Labute, has made some horseshit over the years, so it kind of makes you think this will follow suit. The writers don't have tip-top credentials either. Hm.
Interest Level: My interest is lessening as I write this. It's probably going to be pretty bad, but whatever. I'll probably end up being dragged to it by some friends. And I'll like it. And the whole time I'll have to remind myself that I saw 12 Angry Men the other day, and thoroughly enjoyed it.
Oscar Hopes: Yeah, no chance.
The Bottom Line: It's a little popcorn flick. Nothing more.
The DuchessBackground: It's
the period drama of 2008, apparently. Usually I have a speckle of interest though. I don't for this. Keira Knightley's face annoys me at this point. That, along with everything else about her. Just (kind of) joking. It's an epic about Georgiana Cavendish who has her up's and down's with the Duke, who happens to be Ralph Fiennes. Expect corsets. And British people.
Buzz: The film has gotten some flack for appearing to be mirroring the life of Princess Diana, which understandably, would piss you off. Word out of the Toronto Film Fest: bland. I believe it.
Interest Level: It's the period drama of 2008. Usually I have a speckle of excitement, though. I don't for this.
- The Culture Kid
Oscar Hopes: Should probably get some love for the corsets. Yet, word on the street is that Keira isn't that great in the role due to her lack of chemistry with Dominic Cooper. This should be limited to techs, and probably not that many.
The Bottom: The real
epic of 2008? It's northwest of New Zealand...
BlindnessBackground: It's got a good cast (Julianne Moore, Mark Ruffalo, Danny Glover..), a beloved director, Fernando Meirelles, of City of God fame, and it's based off of an award-winning literary masterpiece (that I could get through..). The makings of some movie magic, eh? But there's a catch: It sucks. (We'll get to that later). It's the story of a blindness epidemic, yet a woman (Julianne Moore) finds herself in an even worse position: being the only one that can see.
Buzz: A few months ago at Cannes? It was a failure and didn't even split the audience.
Everyone hated it. But just a few days ago, it was apparently revamped and met with some positive press out of Toronto. But were the reviews positive
enough?
Interest Level: Who didn't love that
trailer? So, right off the bat, I've been excited. Yet that excitement has subsided a bit, due to its bad press. I still want to see it, but not with an aching desire.
Oscar Hopes: Julianne Moore seems like the best bet for any awards success for this film. But Best Actress is stacked this year. I have some doubts she can make the shortlist. Otherwise, this film has very little Oscar hope.
The Bottom Line: Expect a lot of blind people rolling around in feces.
AppaloosaBackground: Based off of the Robert Parker novel, Appaloosa is about two lawmen (Mortensen and Harris) who are sent to a small town, vying to bring down its tyrant, who just so happens to be Jeremy Irons. Who knew? Ed Harris is directing which, apparently, is a good thing. People liked Pollock.
Buzz: But then the shit hit the fan. Ed Harris directing
isn't a good thing. Word out of Toronto is that..it's nothing to shout about. And here I was, nearly throwing it on my Best Picture ballot. Isn't my innocent stupidity endearing? No?
Interest Level: I witnessed one hell of a Western last year, in Jesse James, so the prospect of another Western, helmed by the impressive Ed Harris, seemed intriguing. And from the plot, it looks like we could be getting a really good villain in Jeremy Irons. I still want to see it, pretty badly.
Oscar Hopes: Very dim at the moment. If they can edit it, positively, before January 22nd they may have more hope. There are a lot of worms in this can, so it's a shame this isn't getting good reception.
The Bottom Line: Who isn't this really good? I'm still not sold on it's below-averageness.
September 26thMiracle At St. AnnaBackground: It looks like Spike Lee is sort of stepping out of his comfort zone here, which is refreshing. The cast kind of sucks, headed by Derek Luke..of no fame. It's about the connection of a 1984 murder to a battalion of black soldiers in WWII, brought together through an intense investigation.
Buzz: I guess this Fall Preview doubles as a Film Festival Wrap-up. Word out of Toronto? Decent, not really good. The expections, unfortunately were sky-high for some, and the final product apparently, doesn't live up to them.
Interest Level: I like Spike Lee. Most of his movies are pretty good. He has something to say. He's ambitious. But, from the start this never excited me too much. I would like to see it a little, I guess.
Oscar Hopes: I'm not taking this off my radar completely, but acting noms and anything major from there, seem unlikely. Too bad. This would have been a cool film to have in the Best Picture line-up.
The Bottom Line: Lee doesn't appear to be back in 'Do The Right Thing' form. Or 'Inside Man' form, for that matter.
ChokeBackground: Written by Chuck Palanhuik in two mediums, now for film, is the story of sex-addict who pays for his sick madre's medical bills by gaining sympathy from those who witness him "choke to death".
Oookaaayyy. Sam Rockwell stars. Clark Gregg randomly directs.
Buzz: Everyone has had their eye on this since they heard the name Chuck Palanhuik involved. (He wrote Fight Club). I'm skeptical, in a way. Might be a little too off-the-walls for some and can Clark Gregg direct? We're kind of still wondering if he can act.
Interest Level: I think it sounds freakishly interesting. That's not always a good thing. Will I see it? Probably not. Will I say that I want to see it now? Yeah.
Oscar Hopes: Maybe..
maybe the screenplay could grab a nom if some crazy shit happened. Otherwise, I can't see the Academy enjoying this.
The Bottom Line: It will probably split audiences. Which is impressive, sometimes.
Eagle EyeBackground: After Disturbia's popularity, Dreamworks piled four screenwriters in a room and forced them without pay, food or any other emenities, to sit the hell down and write another script Shia LaBouef could star in and DJ Caruso could direct. That became Eagle Eye, a story about two strangers who are turned into pawns in a mystery woman's assassination plot. From there, comes a desperate attempt to outwit the woman. The pawns are LaBouef and Michelle Monaghan.
Buzz: There has been a deep ripple of excitement (from me) over this film. I think it has the chance to be pretty good, along with bringing moviegoers into theaters at an off-time.
Interest Level: Not through the roof, but hovering dangerously close to the ceiling fan. The Caruso/LaBouef (even though I'm kind of hating LaBouef lately..) pairing is uber-exciting and the teaser have all been pretty well done.
Oscar Hopes: If it really...and I mean
really takes off, maybe some FX nods could come its way, but other than that, nothing looks to likely.
The Bottom Line: The only popcorn flick this year that I can barely hold my excitement for.
Nights In RodantheBackground: I didn't know the title was pronounced in a such a fruity way, since I saw the promo. Row-don-thee. Is it located in Middle Earth? East of The Shire, maybe? The new Nicolas Sparks film adaptation, like The Notebook. A lovey-dovey story about a doctor who meets an unhappily-married woman at an inn in North Carolina. That's all?
Buzz: The
trailer actually looks pretty damn good, I must say. It also looks mega-cheesy. No early word on how good the film is.
Interest Level: I'm sort of into it. I mean, I never saw The Notebook, but I still know what to expect with this film. Gushy, kind of entertaining, the script begging you to tear up. Oh, yes I know. But I like the cast and the trailer, as stated, was really good. But still...eh...not to "interested".
Oscar Hopes: This is Diane Lane's film, I would think. Gere is an automatic out for some reason, when it comes to Oscars (why?! I ask!). Still, though, can this kind of film push an actress into that stacked of a category? I doubt it.
The Bottom Line: The Notebook with less dying and older people.

Whew. I'm done. October should come out pretty soon. No later than November...heh..heh. The movies look pretty decent, nothing really sticks out, though. September is kind of a down month, so the look ahead is better. Stick around!